Chapter 10 Pluralism and Allocation of Limited Resources Vaccines and Ventilators

In the response to this pandemic, two vital, but controversial ethical questions are we should allocate ventilators to patients with severe respiratory failure, and how we should distribute vaccines to people at risk of contracting coronavirus. There There are opposing ethical views about how to pri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wilkinson, Dominic (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_101546
005 20230719
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230719s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780192871688 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFM  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Wilkinson, Dominic  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 10 Pluralism and Allocation of Limited Resources  |b Vaccines and Ventilators 
260 |a Oxford  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (15 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In the response to this pandemic, two vital, but controversial ethical questions are we should allocate ventilators to patients with severe respiratory failure, and how we should distribute vaccines to people at risk of contracting coronavirus. There There are opposing ethical views about how to prioritise, and countries have taken different different differentdifferentapproaches. There There is a strong ethical argument that policies should take a pluralistic approach to allocation that reflectsreflects reflectsreflectsreflectsmultiple ethical values - both because of the diversity of viewpoints within communities and the recognition that there are competing relevant ethical values. In this chapter, I look at the epistemic and normative problems raised by pluralistic allocation in this pandemic and suggest implications for future pandemics. I summarise some of the relevant evidence about the public's views and values relating to prioritisation. I also explore some practical approaches to prioritisation of scarce resources in the face of contrasting and competing ethical values 
536 |a Wellcome Trust 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Ethical issues & debates  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Pandamic; ethics; vaccines; ventilators 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: Pandemic Ethics 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/63893/1/Bookshelf_NBK592676.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/101546  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication