Chapter 10 Pluralism and Allocation of Limited Resources Vaccines and Ventilators
In the response to this pandemic, two vital, but controversial ethical questions are we should allocate ventilators to patients with severe respiratory failure, and how we should distribute vaccines to people at risk of contracting coronavirus. There There are opposing ethical views about how to pri...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_101546 | ||
005 | 20230719 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20230719s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780192871688 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a JFM |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Wilkinson, Dominic |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter 10 Pluralism and Allocation of Limited Resources |b Vaccines and Ventilators |
260 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2023 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (15 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a In the response to this pandemic, two vital, but controversial ethical questions are we should allocate ventilators to patients with severe respiratory failure, and how we should distribute vaccines to people at risk of contracting coronavirus. There There are opposing ethical views about how to prioritise, and countries have taken different different differentdifferentapproaches. There There is a strong ethical argument that policies should take a pluralistic approach to allocation that reflectsreflects reflectsreflectsreflectsmultiple ethical values - both because of the diversity of viewpoints within communities and the recognition that there are competing relevant ethical values. In this chapter, I look at the epistemic and normative problems raised by pluralistic allocation in this pandemic and suggest implications for future pandemics. I summarise some of the relevant evidence about the public's views and values relating to prioritisation. I also explore some practical approaches to prioritisation of scarce resources in the face of contrasting and competing ethical values | ||
536 | |a Wellcome Trust | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Ethical issues & debates |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Pandamic; ethics; vaccines; ventilators | ||
773 | 1 | 0 | |7 nnaa |o OAPEN Library UUID: Pandemic Ethics |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/63893/1/Bookshelf_NBK592676.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/101546 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |