Chapter 2 Animal sacrifice on trial Moral reforms and religious freedom in India

Animal sacrifices are commonly practised in Himachal Pradesh on various occasions, including public festivals at the district level. Over recent years criticism of the practice has increased and some cases have been brought before the court. This chapter focuses on three court cases that were jointl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berti, Daniela (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_101714
005 20230719
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230719s2024 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781003284949-3 
020 |a 9781032257686 
020 |a 9781032318134 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9781003284949-3  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFSL  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a GTB  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JHBC  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Berti, Daniela  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 2 Animal sacrifice on trial  |b Moral reforms and religious freedom in India 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2024 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (53 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Animal sacrifices are commonly practised in Himachal Pradesh on various occasions, including public festivals at the district level. Over recent years criticism of the practice has increased and some cases have been brought before the court. This chapter focuses on three court cases that were jointly decided in 2014 by the Himachal Pradesh High Court, where the judge ruled a total ban on animal sacrifice in the state of Himachal Pradesh. The case is still pending at the Supreme Court which means that it may potentially have an impact at national level. I first consider the context of this controversy, and the official and unofficial discourses of those involved in the case. Based on the court file, newspapers and ethnographic data, I then analyse the judicial handling of the case, which refers to legal, ritual, or reformist arguments or to animal welfare. The last section draws a comparison with a case concerning animal sacrifice in the Santeria religion, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, in order to bring out differences in the legal approaches in the two cases despite being both grounded in common law. It shows how, contrary to the legal handling of this issue in the Santeria case where the main concern is to protect religious freedom, in the Himachal Pradesh case the judge explicitly and repeatedly appealed to the role of the court in defining religion (as opposed to superstition), and to the court's responsibility in favouring 'moral progress' and promoting religious reforms. 
536 |a Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Ethnic studies  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Regional studies  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Social research & statistics  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Animal Sacrifice, Religion, Law, South Asia 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: Animal Sacrifice, Religion and Law in South Asia 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/63836/1/9781003284949_10.4324_9781003284949-3.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/101714  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication