Chapter Misinformation and disinformation in statistical methodology for social sciences: causes, consequences and remedies

The present is an introductory summary on the topic of misinformative and fraudolent statistical inferences, in the light of recent attempts to reform social sciences. The manuscript is focused is on the concept of replicability, that is the likelihood of a scientific result to be reached by two ind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cantone, Giulio Giacomo (auth)
Other Authors: Tomaselli, Venera (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Florence Firenze University Press, Genova University Press 2023
Series:Proceedings e report
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_111980
005 20230808
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230808s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 979-12-215-0106-3.10 
020 |a 9791221501063 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/979-12-215-0106-3.10  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a J  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Cantone, Giulio Giacomo  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Tomaselli, Venera  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter Misinformation and disinformation in statistical methodology for social sciences: causes, consequences and remedies 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press, Genova University Press  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (6 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Proceedings e report 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The present is an introductory summary on the topic of misinformative and fraudolent statistical inferences, in the light of recent attempts to reform social sciences. The manuscript is focused is on the concept of replicability, that is the likelihood of a scientific result to be reached by two independent sources. Replication studies are often ignored and most of the scientific interest regards papers presenting theoretical novelties. As a result, replicability happens to be uncorrelated with bibliometric performances. These often reflect only the popularity of a theory, but not its validity. These topics are illustrated via two case studies of very popular theories. Statistical errors and bad practices are discussed. The consequences of the practice of omitting inconclusive results from a paper, or 'p-hacking', are discussed. Among the remedies, the practice of preregistration is presented, along with attempts to reform peer review through it. As a tool to measure the sensitivity of a scientific theory to misinformation and disinformation, multiversal theory and methods are discussed. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Society & social sciences  |2 bicssc 
653 |a replication crisis 
653 |a research evaluation 
653 |a p-hacking 
653 |a preregistration 
653 |a multiverse analysis 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: ASA 2022 Data-Driven Decision Making 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/74882/1/9791221501063-10.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/111980  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication