A Republic of Men The American Founders, Gendered Language, and Patriarchal Politics

What role did manhood play in early American Politics? In A Republic of Men, Mark E. Kann argues that the American founders aspired to create a "republic of men" but feared that "disorderly men" threatened its birth, health, and longevity. Kann demonstrates how hegemonic norms of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kann, Mark E. (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: NYU Press 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_114321
005 20231005
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20231005s1998 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a j.ctt9qg73c 
020 |a 9780814763520 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.2307/j.ctt9qg73c  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JPA  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Kann, Mark E.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a A Republic of Men  |b The American Founders, Gendered Language, and Patriarchal Politics 
260 |b NYU Press  |c 1998 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a What role did manhood play in early American Politics? In A Republic of Men, Mark E. Kann argues that the American founders aspired to create a "republic of men" but feared that "disorderly men" threatened its birth, health, and longevity. Kann demonstrates how hegemonic norms of manhood-exemplified by "the Family Man," for instance--were deployed as a means of stigmatizing unworthy men, rewarding responsible men with citizenship, and empowering exceptional men with positions of leadership and authority, while excluding women from public life. Kann suggests that the founders committed themselves in theory to the democratic proposition that all men were created free and equal and could not be governed without their own consent, but that they in no way believed that "all men" could be trusted with equal liberty, equal citizenship, or equal authority. The founders developed a "grammar of manhood" to address some difficult questions about public order. Were America's disorderly men qualified for citizenship? Were they likely to recognize manly leaders, consent to their authority, and defer to their wisdom? A Republic of Men compellingly analyzes the ways in which the founders used a rhetoric of manhood to stabilize American politics. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Political science & theory  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Political Science 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt9qg73c  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/114321  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication