Deliberate Acts Changing Hopi Culture Through the Oraibi Split

In the Oraibi split of 1906, "traditional" Hopis separated themselves from "progressives" and established the new settlement of Hotevilla in what has been accepted as a response to changing tribal politics. Following the split, some returned to Oraibi but eventually left to estab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Whiteley, Peter M. (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Press 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_114354
005 20231005
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20231005s1988 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a j.ctvss3zjd 
020 |a 9780816537877 
020 |a 9780816510375 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.2307/j.ctvss3zjd  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JF  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JHMC  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Whiteley, Peter M.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Deliberate Acts  |b Changing Hopi Culture Through the Oraibi Split 
260 |b University of Arizona Press  |c 1988 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In the Oraibi split of 1906, "traditional" Hopis separated themselves from "progressives" and established the new settlement of Hotevilla in what has been accepted as a response to changing tribal politics. Following the split, some returned to Oraibi but eventually left to establish another new settlement at Bacavi. Drawing on oral accounts from Hopi consultants and on contemporary documents, Peter M. Whiteley argues that the split was in fact the result of a conspiracy among Hopi politico-religious leaders from both the "hostile" and "friendly" factions, a revolution to overturn the allegedly corrupt Oraibi religious order. A crucial element of Whiteley's thesis is that, contrary to established theory, Hopi society was not egalitarian but was controlled by a ruling elite, the pavansinom, who clandestinely planned such events as the destruction of Awatovi because of its reacceptance of Franciscan priests. Through an analysis of Bacavi social structure, Whiteley demonstrates how one fragment of a well-established society went about creating a new social order after the old one drastically fragmented. His detailed portrait of the history and social organization of a Hopi village represents an unusually rich resource for students of Hopi culture and history. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Society & culture: general  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Social & cultural anthropology, ethnography  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Sociology 
653 |a Anthropology 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctvss3zjd  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/114354  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication