Misfortunes of War Press and Public Reactions to Civilian Deaths in Wartime

This monograph, part of a larger study of ways to reduce collateral damage undertaken for the U.S. Air Force, analyzes media and public reactions to civilian casualty incidents, whether these incidents affect media reporting or public support for military operations, and, if so, how. It analyzes cas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Larson, Eric V. (auth)
Other Authors: Savych, Bogdan (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: RAND Corporation 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_114649
005 20231005
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20231005s2007 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a MG441AF 
020 |a 9780833042446 
020 |a 9780833038975 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.7249/MG441AF  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HBW  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JW  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Larson, Eric V.  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Savych, Bogdan  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Misfortunes of War  |b Press and Public Reactions to Civilian Deaths in Wartime 
260 |b RAND Corporation  |c 2007 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a This monograph, part of a larger study of ways to reduce collateral damage undertaken for the U.S. Air Force, analyzes media and public reactions to civilian casualty incidents, whether these incidents affect media reporting or public support for military operations, and, if so, how. It analyzes case studies of incidents of civilian deaths in the February 1991 bombing of the Al Firdos bunker in the Gulf War, the April and May 1999 attacks on the Djakovica convoy and Chinese embassy during the war in Kosovo, the June 2002 attack involving an Afghan wedding party during operations in Afghanistan, and the March 2003 incident involving a large explosion in a crowded Baghdad marketplace to describe and explain how the U.S. and foreign media and publics have responded. For each case study, the study team examined press, public, and leadership responses to these incidents and found the following. First, while avoiding civilian casualties is important to the American public, it has realistic expectations about the actual possibilities for avoiding casualties. Second, the press reports heavily on civilian casualty incidents. Third, adversaries understand the publicÂ's sensitivities to civilian deaths and have sought to exploit them. Fourth, during armed conflict, the belief that the United States and its allies are trying to avoid casualties most affects support for U.S. military operations, both at home and abroad. Fifth, while strong majorities of Americans typically give U.S. military and political leaders the benefit of the doubt when civilian casualty incidents occur, this does not necessarily extend to foreign audiences. Sixth, when civilian casualty incidents occur, it is at least as important to get the story right as to get the story out. Finally, attention to and concern about civilian casualties both at home and abroad have increased in recent years and may continue to do so. 
540 |a All rights reserved  |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Military history  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Warfare & defence  |2 bicssc 
653 |a History 
653 |a Political Science 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/MG441AF  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/114649  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication