An Operational Architecture for Improving Air Force Command and Control Through Enhanced Agile Combat Support Planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Control Processes
Currently, agile combat support (ACS) planning, execution, monitoring, and control processes are poorly integrated with operational planning processes and have little ability to show how resource allocation decisions would impact planned and potential operations. This report presents a refined archi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
RAND Corporation
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_115465 | ||
| 005 | 20231005 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20231005s2014 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a j.ctt14bs2k0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833090034 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833081407 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7249/j.ctt14bs2k0 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a JWK |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a JWG |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a TTM |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lynch, Kristin F. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Drew, John G. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tripp, Robert S. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Romano, Daniel M. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yi, Jin Woo |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An Operational Architecture for Improving Air Force Command and Control Through Enhanced Agile Combat Support Planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Control Processes |
| 260 | |b RAND Corporation |c 2014 | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Currently, agile combat support (ACS) planning, execution, monitoring, and control processes are poorly integrated with operational planning processes and have little ability to show how resource allocation decisions would impact planned and potential operations. This report presents a refined architecture based on previous RAND-developed operational architectures that depicts how, in the next 4-5 years, enhanced ACS processes could be integrated into Air Force command and control to provide senior leaders with enterprise ACS capability and constraint information. | ||
| 540 | |a All rights reserved |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Defence strategy, planning & research |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Air forces & warfare |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Military engineering |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a History | ||
| 653 | |a Technology | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs2k0 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/115465 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |