Implementation Actions for Improving Air Force Command and Control Through Enhanced Agile Combat Support Planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Control Processes
Using the architecture developed as a companion piece to this analysis, this report identifies and describes where shortfalls exist between current agile combat support (ACS) processes and the vision for integrating enhanced ACS processes into Air Force command and control (C2). It evaluates C2 node...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
RAND Corporation
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_115466 | ||
| 005 | 20231005 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20231005s2014 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a j.ctt14bs2s3 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833090041 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833081414 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7249/j.ctt14bs2s3 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a JWK |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a JWG |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a TTM |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Lynch, Kristin F. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Drew, John G. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tripp, Robert S. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Romano, Daniel M. |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yi, Jin Woo |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Implementation Actions for Improving Air Force Command and Control Through Enhanced Agile Combat Support Planning, Execution, Monitoring, and Control Processes |
| 260 | |b RAND Corporation |c 2014 | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Using the architecture developed as a companion piece to this analysis, this report identifies and describes where shortfalls exist between current agile combat support (ACS) processes and the vision for integrating enhanced ACS processes into Air Force command and control (C2). It evaluates C2 nodes at each echelon of responsibility and across operational phases and suggests mitigation strategies needed to facilitate an efficient and effective global C2 network. | ||
| 540 | |a All rights reserved |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Defence strategy, planning & research |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Air forces & warfare |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Military engineering |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a History | ||
| 653 | |a Technology | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt14bs2s3 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/115466 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |