Big Research Questions about the Human Condition A Historian's Will

My basic message can be put in a straightforward way: humanities scholars should improve their way of asking questions. Their questions about the human condition need to be as clear and simple as possible in order to enable unambiguous answers. Simple without being simplistic, nuanced without being...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jarrick, Arne (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Anthem Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_116093
005 20231005
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20231005s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a j.ctv23xmqxd 
020 |a 9781785275685 
020 |a 9781785275678 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.2307/j.ctv23xmqxd  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a H  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a PDA  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a HP  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Jarrick, Arne  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Big Research Questions about the Human Condition  |b A Historian's Will 
260 |b Anthem Press  |c 2021 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a My basic message can be put in a straightforward way: humanities scholars should improve their way of asking questions. Their questions about the human condition need to be as clear and simple as possible in order to enable unambiguous answers. Simple without being simplistic, nuanced without being embroiled - that is the ideal. Unambiguous answers (not to be confused with irrefutable answers) are much wanted, although not always possible to attain. Moreover, if one wants the questions to be highly significant for the understanding of the human condition, there should not be too many questions. Even in this respect, there is much to be wanted in today's humanities research. Instead of gathering around a limited set of profound questions and holding on to them until the answers begin to appear, generally the humanist guild scatters its scientific energy on too many disparate things - replacing them far too often with hundreds of new questions, 'perspectives' and 'problematisations'. In its turn, such a research culture may hamper a cumulative growth of knowledge, the possibility of which, moreover, is regrettably often denied or even viewed with suspicion. In this book, I am doing two things to redress the current problems in the humanities world-wide. Firstly, I present and discuss a set of big but still insufficiently addressed topics that humanities researchers should focus over a sustained period of time, such as what explains that some kinds of knowledge are widely accepted whereas other kinds of knowledge are rejected, or what explains the widespread diffusion of inequality paralleled by a gradual emergence of egalitarianism over the centuries, et cetera. Secondly, I discuss in general terms what the humanities are or should be, as well as what they are not or should not be. Basically, humanities researchers should consider their field as an integral part of science, although uniquely dealing with humans a decision making, meaning seeking and self-reflecting agents. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Humanities  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Philosophy of science  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Philosophy  |2 bicssc 
653 |a History 
653 |a General Science 
653 |a Philosophy 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv23xmqxd  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/116093  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication