Chapter 4 New Archaeology, Old Europe, and the Feminist Science Debates Marija Gimbutas' "Pre-Her-Story" in Academia

The chapter traces Gimbutas' engagement with gender as a research topic, proposing that her work on European prehistory should be seen as written from a feminist point of view. It explains her contributions to rewriting prehistory from a women-centered perspective, her reinterpretations of fema...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Navickaitė, Rasa (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_121817
005 20231117
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20231117s2023 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781003215592-6 
020 |a 9781032104898 
020 |a 9781032104904 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9781003215592-6  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HD  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Navickaitė, Rasa  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 4 New Archaeology, Old Europe, and the Feminist Science Debates  |b Marija Gimbutas' "Pre-Her-Story" in Academia 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2023 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (44 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The chapter traces Gimbutas' engagement with gender as a research topic, proposing that her work on European prehistory should be seen as written from a feminist point of view. It explains her contributions to rewriting prehistory from a women-centered perspective, her reinterpretations of female symbolism in early figurative art, and her implicit critique of the androcentric narratives of the development of Western civilization. It discusses also Gimbutas' scholarly persona and the way she combined aspects of an Enlightenment ideal of disinterested perspective with a Romantic notion of scholarly discovery as divine inspiration, which she expressed through reference to the Lithuanian folk figure of a witch - the Ragana. The chapter analyzes the critiques of Gimbutas' work and places them within the context of the changing paradigms of the discipline of archaeology. It shows how the introduction of post-structuralist feminist approaches to archaeology changed the way scholars perceive the question of gender in prehistory and, by extension, Gimbutas' work. The chapter proposes to consider her work as a "pre-her-story" of archaeology. 
536 |a University of Washington 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Archaeology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Marija Gimbutas, gender studies, archaeology, prehistoric archaeology, feminism 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: Marija Gimbutas 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/76332/1/9781003215592_10.4324_9781003215592-6.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/121817  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication