Last Day Every Day: Figural Thinking from Auerbach and Kracauer to Agamben and Brenez

Where is film analysis at today? What is cinema theory up to, behind our backs? The field, as professionally defined (at least in the Anglo-American academic world), is presently divided between contextual historians who turn to broad formations of modernity, and stylistic connoisseurs who call for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin, Adrian (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Brooklyn, NY punctum books 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_25862
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a P3.0012.1.00 
020 |a 9780615719467 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.21983/P3.0012.1.00  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a APFA  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Martin, Adrian  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Last Day Every Day: Figural Thinking from Auerbach and Kracauer to Agamben and Brenez 
260 |a Brooklyn, NY  |b punctum books  |c 2012 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (54 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Where is film analysis at today? What is cinema theory up to, behind our backs? The field, as professionally defined (at least in the Anglo-American academic world), is presently divided between contextual historians who turn to broad formations of modernity, and stylistic connoisseurs who call for a return to old-fashioned things like authorial vision, tone, and mise en scène. But there are other, vital, inventive currents happening - in criticism, on the Internet, in small magazines, and renegade conferences everywhere - which we are not hearing much about in any official way. Last Day Every Day shines a light on one of these exciting new avenues. Is there a way to bring together, in a refreshed manner, textual logic, hermeneutic interpretation, theoretical speculation, and socio-political history? A way to break the deadlock between classical approaches that sought organic coherence in film works, and poststructuralist approaches that exposed the heterogeneity of all texts and scattered the pieces to the four winds? A way to attend to the minute materiality of cinema, while grasping and contesting the histories imbricated in every image and sound? 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Film theory & criticism  |2 bicssc 
653 |a film studies 
653 |a Eric Auerbach 
653 |a Siegfried Kracauer 
653 |a Nicole Brenez 
653 |a Douglas Sirk 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/25603/1/1004492.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/25603/1/1004492.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/25603/1/1004492.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/25603/1/1004492.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/25862  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication