Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules
This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal frame...
Saved in:
Other Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cham
Springer Nature
2019
|
Series: | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_25890 | ||
005 | 20210210 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210210s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 978-3-030-12520-2 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a JP |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LB |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LBBZ |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LNF |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a LNFB |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Gless, Sabine |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Richter, Thomas |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Gless, Sabine |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Richter, Thomas |4 oth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? |b A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules |
260 | |a Cham |b Springer Nature |c 2019 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (380 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved. ; | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Politics & government |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a International law |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a International criminal law |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Criminal law & procedure |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Criminal justice law |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Law | ||
653 | |a Private international law | ||
653 | |a Conflict of laws | ||
653 | |a International criminal law | ||
653 | |a Criminal law | ||
653 | |a Criminal justice, Administration of | ||
653 | |a Social justice | ||
653 | |a Human rights | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/23097/1/1007061.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/25890 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |