Dignitas Voluntas - Vita - Überlegungen zur Sterbehilfe aus rechtshistorischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Sicht Göttinger Antrittsvorlesung im Januar 2006
Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on "self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care faci...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Published: |
Universitätsverlag Göttingen
2006
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_28352 | ||
| 005 | 20210210 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20210210s2006 xx |||||o ||| 0|deu d | ||
| 020 | |a gup2006-21 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.17875/gup2006-21 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a deu | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a L |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a JFME |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LNF |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Schumann, Eva |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dignitas |b Voluntas - Vita - Überlegungen zur Sterbehilfe aus rechtshistorischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Sicht Göttinger Antrittsvorlesung im Januar 2006 |
| 260 | |b Universitätsverlag Göttingen |c 2006 | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on "self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care facilities is recquired and also improvements of care in nursing homes as well as offers to improve the integration of members into care. These claims conclude the discussion between assistance in dying (indirect euthanasia), and assistance to die (active and passive euthanasia). Taking account historical, interdisciplinary and comparative law issues it is demonstrated that the formal legal distinction between the various case groups of euthanasia not sufficiently takes into account the social dimension of dying. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f by-nd/2.0/de/deed.de |2 cc |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/de/deed.de | ||
| 546 | |a German | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Law |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Ethical issues: euthanasia & right to die |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Criminal law & procedure |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a law | ||
| 653 | |a euthanasia | ||
| 653 | |a geriatric welfare | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/36889/1/dignitas.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/36889/1/dignitas.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/28352 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |