The Impatient Muse Germany and the Sturm und Drang

Far from being a forerunner of Weimar Classicism or an addendum to the Enlightenment, the Sturm und Drang is best seen as part of an autonomous culture of impatience-as literature in which Germans, frustrated with their fragmented land, simulated a sense of power and effectiveness that political rea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leidner, Alan C. (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Chapel Hill The University of North Carolina Press 1994
Series:UNC Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_31182
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s1994 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781469656731_Leidner 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.5149/9781469656731_Leidner  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a DS  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Leidner, Alan C.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Impatient Muse  |b Germany and the Sturm und Drang 
260 |a Chapel Hill  |b The University of North Carolina Press  |c 1994 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (168 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a UNC Studies in the Germanic Languages and Literatures 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Far from being a forerunner of Weimar Classicism or an addendum to the Enlightenment, the Sturm und Drang is best seen as part of an autonomous culture of impatience-as literature in which Germans, frustrated with their fragmented land, simulated a sense of power and effectiveness that political realities did not afford. This impatience drove not only authors and the characters they created; it also drew in German audiences and readers ready to partake vicariously in national sentiments that they otherwise could not have experienced. Alan Leidner sees Lavater's work as a model for dealing with a limiting culture, Goethe's Werther as a subtly arrogant figure, the drama of the "Kraftmensch" as a literature legitimizing the violence of its protagonists, the famous split in the "Urfaust" as the result of Goethe's resistance to the impatience that led many writers to fabricate a German nation that did not exist, and Schiller's "Die Räuber" as a liberating ritual that allowed German audiences to enjoy temporary feelings of national community. He concludes his study with an analysis of J. M. R. Lenz, whose texts recoil unequivocally in the face of the impatient muse. 
536 |a National Endowment for the Humanities 
536 |a Andrew W. Mellon Foundation 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Literature: history & criticism  |2 bicssc 
653 |a German Studies 
653 |a Literature 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/39864/1/9781469656731_WEB.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/31182  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication