Essential Vulnerabilities Plato and Levinas on Relations to the Other

In Essential Vulnerabilities, Deborah Achtenberg contests Emmanuel Levinas's idea that Plato is a philosopher of freedom for whom thought is a return to the self. Instead, Plato, like Levinas, is a philosopher of the other. Nonetheless, Achtenberg argues, Plato and Levinas are different. Though...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Achtenberg, Deborah (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Evanston, Illinois Northwestern University Press 2016
Series:Rereading Ancient Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_36044
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a j.ctv3znz3r 
020 |a 9780810129948 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.2307/j.ctv3znz3r  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPQ  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Achtenberg, Deborah  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Essential Vulnerabilities  |b Plato and Levinas on Relations to the Other 
260 |a Evanston, Illinois  |b Northwestern University Press  |c 2016 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Rereading Ancient Philosophy 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In Essential Vulnerabilities, Deborah Achtenberg contests Emmanuel Levinas's idea that Plato is a philosopher of freedom for whom thought is a return to the self. Instead, Plato, like Levinas, is a philosopher of the other. Nonetheless, Achtenberg argues, Plato and Levinas are different. Though they share the view that human beings are essentially vulnerable and essentially in relation to others, they conceive human vulnerability and responsiveness differently. For Plato, when we see beautiful others, we are overwhelmed by the beauty of what is, by the vision of eternal form. For Levinas, we are disrupted by the newness, foreignness, or singularity of the other. The other, for him, is new or foreign, not eternal. The other is unknowable singularity. By showing these similarities and differences, Achtenberg resituates Plato in relation to Levinas and opens up two contrasting ways that self is essentially in relation to others. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Ethics & moral philosophy  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Philosophy 
653 |a Emmanuel Levinas 
653 |a God 
653 |a Hippias 
653 |a Meno 
653 |a Phaedrus (dialogue) 
653 |a Plato 
653 |a Socrates 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/29703/1/1000242.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/29703/1/1000242.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/29703/1/1000242.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/29703/1/1000242.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/36044  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication