Freiheit, Kontrolle und Verantwortlichkeit in der Gesellschaft. Moderne Biotechnologie als Lehrstück

The responsibility of science is the starting point for intensive discussions. But who is responsible ty for what? This work is based on many years of research into the developments in modern biotechnology. The thorough analysis shows that responsibility is usually borne by the others. Political, le...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Albrecht, Stephan (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Published: Hamburg Hamburg University Press 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_37055
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s2006 xx |||||o ||| 0|deu d
020 |a HUP.10 
020 |a 9783937816166 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.15460/HUP.10  |c doi 
041 0 |a deu 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a TCB  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Albrecht, Stephan  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Freiheit, Kontrolle und Verantwortlichkeit in der Gesellschaft. Moderne Biotechnologie als Lehrstück 
260 |a Hamburg  |b Hamburg University Press  |c 2006 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (459 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The responsibility of science is the starting point for intensive discussions. But who is responsible ty for what? This work is based on many years of research into the developments in modern biotechnology. The thorough analysis shows that responsibility is usually borne by the others. Political, legal, administrative and intra-scientific communication and action structures prevent or dilute responsibility to the point of inaccessibility. Stephan Albrecht uses numerous examples from the fields of medicine, agriculture, pharmacy and environmental technology to demonstrate that biotechnological progress is not evolutionary but political, man-made. However, a fundamental error in this progress is that it is not properly understood and negotiated in public, as a res publica. From a democratic point of view, the author proposes an institutional approach to the perception of responsibility in and for the sciences, which is oriented towards the specific challenges of technological innovation and at the same time builds on the best practices of political and civic decision-making. 
540 |a All rights reserved  |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights 
546 |a German 
650 7 |a Biotechnology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Biotechnology 
653 |a political decision-making 
653 |a responsibility 
653 |a political and social sciences 
653 |a science 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27671/1/1002334.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27671/1/1002334.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27671/1/1002334.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27671/1/1002334.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/37055  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication