Just Vibrations: The Purpose of Sounding Good

Modern academic criticism bursts with what Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick once termed paranoid readings-interpretative feats that aim to prove a point, persuade an audience, and subtly denigrate anyone who disagrees. Driven by strategies of negation and suspicion, such rhetoric tends to drown out softer-spok...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cheng, William (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_38931
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a mpub.9293551 
020 |a 9780472073252;9780472053254 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.3998/mpub.9293551  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a AV  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Cheng, William  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Just Vibrations: The Purpose of Sounding Good 
260 |a Ann Arbor  |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2016 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (181 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Modern academic criticism bursts with what Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick once termed paranoid readings-interpretative feats that aim to prove a point, persuade an audience, and subtly denigrate anyone who disagrees. Driven by strategies of negation and suspicion, such rhetoric tends to drown out softer-spoken reparative efforts, which forego forceful argument in favor of ruminations on pleasure, love, sentiment, reform, care, and accessibility. Just Vibrations: The Purpose of Sounding Good calls for a time-out in our serious games of critical exchange. Charting the divergent paths of paranoid and reparative affects through illness narratives, academic work, queer life, noise pollution, sonic torture, and other touchy subjects, William Cheng exposes a host of stubborn norms in our daily orientations toward scholarship, self, and sound. How we choose to think about the perpetration and tolerance of critical and acoustic offenses may ultimately lead us down avenues of ethical ruin-or, if we choose, repair. With recourse to experimental rhetoric, interdisciplinary discretion, and the playful wisdoms of childhood, Cheng contends that reparative attitudes toward music and musicology can serve as barometers of better worlds. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Music  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Media 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/24002/1/1006131.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/24002/1/1006131.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/24002/1/1006131.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/38931  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication