The Reality of Tense

philosophical jargon are called Tenses". To claim that Tenses are real is to claim that they are satisfied, i.e. that something in fact possesses them. The debate between realists and antirealists concerning Tense has so far been conducted in ontological terms. Realists about Tense (so-called A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richter, Stefanie (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Hamburg Hamburg University Press 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_39031
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s2004 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a HUP.8 
020 |a 9783980898584 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.15460/HUP.8  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a C  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Richter, Stefanie  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a The Reality of Tense 
260 |a Hamburg  |b Hamburg University Press  |c 2004 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (210 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a philosophical jargon are called Tenses". To claim that Tenses are real is to claim that they are satisfied, i.e. that something in fact possesses them. The debate between realists and antirealists concerning Tense has so far been conducted in ontological terms. Realists about Tense (so-called A-theorists)claim that things really do have Tenses, antirealists (Btheorists) deny this. Most of them claim that Tenses can be reduced to tenseless properties. This book criticises the current debate between A-theorists like Quentin Smith and B-theorists like D. H. Mellor on methodological grounds. It suggests an alternative strategy for how the debate might proceed, where insights from other kinds of realism-debates are made useful for the debate about Tense. This book makes the original attempt to apply two general frameworks for realism-debates, developed by Michael Dummett and Crispin Wright, to the debate about Tense. Here the focus lies on the correct interpretation of the truth-predicate for statements of the disputed kind. The aim of this publication is to show that the debate about the reality of Tense should be reinterpreted as a debate about the truth and semantics of statements which ascribe Tenses." 
540 |a All rights reserved  |4 http://oapen.org/content/about-rights 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Language  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Philosophy of Language 
653 |a Tense 
653 |a Tempus 
653 |a Linguistics 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27673/1/1002332.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27673/1/1002332.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27673/1/1002332.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/27673/1/1002332.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/39031  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication