Alternative Models of Addiction

For much of the 20th century, theories of addictive behaviour and motivation were polarized between two models. The first model viewed addiction as a moral failure for which addicts are rightly held responsible and judged accordingly. The second model, in contrast, viewed addiction as a specific bra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bennett Foddy (auth)
Other Authors: Serge H. Ahmed (auth), Hanna Pickard (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2015
Series:Frontiers Research Topics
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_40700
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2015 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-2-88919-713-2 
020 |a 9782889197132 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.3389/978-2-88919-713-2  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a M  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Bennett Foddy  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Serge H. Ahmed  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Hanna Pickard  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Alternative Models of Addiction 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (173 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Frontiers Research Topics 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a For much of the 20th century, theories of addictive behaviour and motivation were polarized between two models. The first model viewed addiction as a moral failure for which addicts are rightly held responsible and judged accordingly. The second model, in contrast, viewed addiction as a specific brain disease caused by neurobiological adaptations occurring in response to chronic drug or alcohol use, and over which addicts have no choice or control. As our capacity to observe neurobiological phenomena improved, the second model became scientific orthodoxy, increasingly dominating addiction research and informing public understandings of addiction. More recently, however, a dissenting view has emerged within addiction research, based partly on new scientific research and partly on progress in philosophical and psychological understandings of relevant mental phenomena. This view does not revert to treating addiction as a moral failure, but nonetheless holds that addictive behaviour is fundamentally motivated by choice and subject to at least a degree of voluntary control. On this alternative model of addiction, addictive behaviour is an instrumental means to ends that are desired by the individual, although much controversy exists with respect to the rationality or irrationality of these ends, the degree and nature of the voluntary control of addictive behaviour and motivation, the explanation of the difference between addictive and non-addictive behaviour and motivation, and, lastly, the extent to which addictive behaviour and motivation is correctly characterised as pathological or diseased. This research topic includes papers in the traditions of neuroscience, psychology, philosophy, law and social science that explore alternative understandings of addiction. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Medicine  |2 bicssc 
653 |a compulsion 
653 |a Addiction 
653 |a Disease 
653 |a drugs 
653 |a Self-Control 
653 |a choice 
653 |a substance abuse 
653 |a substance dependence 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1036/alternative-models-of-addiction  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40700  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication