Autonomie der Trauer Zur Ambivalenz des sozialen Wandels

Funeral culture is changing rapidly. In recent years, graveyards and burial rituals in Germany have altered significantly. They no longer reflect mechanisms of collective sense-making; instead, they represent individual lifeworlds. Death and the decisions and actions surrounding it have, in effect,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benkel, Thorsten (auth)
Other Authors: Preuß, Dirk (auth), Meitzler, Matthias (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Published: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG 2019
Series:Dimensionen der Sorge
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_41661
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|deu d
020 |a /dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748901525 
020 |a 9783748901525 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783748901525  |c doi 
041 0 |a deu 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Benkel, Thorsten  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Preuß, Dirk  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Meitzler, Matthias  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Autonomie der Trauer  |b Zur Ambivalenz des sozialen Wandels 
260 |b Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (220 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Dimensionen der Sorge 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Funeral culture is changing rapidly. In recent years, graveyards and burial rituals in Germany have altered significantly. They no longer reflect mechanisms of collective sense-making; instead, they represent individual lifeworlds. Death and the decisions and actions surrounding it have, in effect, become characterised by pluralism.When it comes to legal regulations, however, no change is visible. The law does not interpret the aforementioned cultural transformation from the perspective of the bereaved. It is thus not surprising that graveyard rules and especially the stipulation that human remains may only be interred in a cemetery have come under criticism.Yet today, practices have evolved by which the bereaved can sidestep the rules and keep the ashes of their deceased relatives with them, or scatter them at alternative locations. The trigger for this silent revolution is individualisation. However much individual decisions play a role in this respect, this development is also the result of changes within the cultural mind. They both mark a shift towards mourning becoming more autonomous. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a German 
653 |a Thanatologie 
653 |a Tod 
653 |a Selbstbestimmung 
653 |a Sozialer Wandel 
653 |a Umgang mit Trauernden 
653 |a Bestattungsgesetz 
653 |a Methodologie 
653 |a Grab 
653 |a Ethik des Trauerns 
653 |a Interview 
653 |a Sinnkonstruktion 
653 |a Friedhofskultur 
653 |a Gesellschaftliche Transformation 
653 |a Kremation 
653 |a Trauer 
653 |a Bestattungskultur 
653 |a Mitbestimmung 
653 |a Trauererfahrungen 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783748901525  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41661  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication