Balkán a migrace: Na křižovatce antropologických perspektiv

The collective monograph Balkans and migration includes five chapters written by anthropologically oriented researchers (L. Budilová, G. Fatková, L. Hanus, M. Jakoubek, M. Pavlásek) practicing a long-term research in the Balkan territory. In addition to general parameters of anthropological optic...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
第一著者: Marek Jakoubek (auth)
その他の著者: Lukáš Hanus (auth), Lenka J. Budilová (auth), Michal Pavlásek (auth), Gabriela Fatková (auth)
フォーマット: 電子媒体 図書の章
出版事項: AntropoWeb 2011
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
タグ: タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_41794
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2011 xx |||||o ||| 0|ces d
020 |a 9788090509818 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a ces 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Marek Jakoubek  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Lukáš Hanus  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Lenka J. Budilová  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Michal Pavlásek  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Gabriela Fatková  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Balkán a migrace: Na křižovatce antropologických perspektiv 
260 |b AntropoWeb  |c 2011 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (149 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The collective monograph Balkans and migration includes five chapters written by anthropologically oriented researchers (L. Budilová, G. Fatková, L. Hanus, M. Jakoubek, M. Pavlásek) practicing a long-term research in the Balkan territory. In addition to general parameters of anthropological optics and an anthropological field research in the Balkans those particular studies are connected by study transversal theme of migration. While, however, the Balkans and anthropology in the publication are invariant framework guaranteeing the unity of the whole volume, the migration represent in this respect the constant variable. The given phenomenon is studied in case of various groups (Bulgarian and Romanian Czechs, Karakachans), and we can observe some aspects of its heterogeneous nature (post-war migration within the re-emigrant interstate agreements, seasonal labor migration, migration of farmers for the land, leaving the homeland because of religious disputes, etc.). The ambition of the monograph is to justify the relevance to attend to the fieldwork based research in the Balkans, and show why the new generation of anthropologists and other social scientists, practitioners, should pay their professional attention to the Balkan peninsula. Although Western anthropologists have been already focused on the Balkans for few decades, in Czech environment was this theme ignored by anthropologists and ethnographers. They yielded this interest to the political scientists, historians, travelers, and television reporters. This monograph is going to rectify this situation by a series of analyses applying different perspectives of the research. Those analyses are based on the interpretation of ethnographic data collected during the long-term field research. The Balkan peninsula and this terrain inhabiting populations are presented as a stimulating field for Czech anthropological researchers. An attractive topic reflected in those five chapters is the Czech expatriate presence in the Balkans. Until the present time there live several enclaves of Czech compatriots, who actively claim their Czech origin. Those enclaves adapt dynamically to the global political and economic changes. Not only the authors of this monograph have noticed that the science paradigm in the second half of the twentieth century, which is based on a priori national categorization, is not able to capture new social and cultural formations of minority groups living outside their "homeland". An attempt to overcome the nationalistic classification of Czech (e) migration could be applied and grounded in many identification strategies taking place in the distant past. It seems that the time has come to revise the still dominant scientific approaches to expatriate minorities and expand their attention to the dimensions of collective life reflecting the changes in the last twenty years. The transformation of strategies of Czech expatriate minorities in topologically, economically and politically open Europe (hence the global environment) is a useful platform, where certain phenomena can be observed. Those phenomena produce inspiring issues of sustainability and transformation of collective identities in the contemporary world. Certain marginality of the region including more difficulties in accessibility of resources force the marginal populations to adapt to difficult conditions. These minorities are a good example for monitoring the development of organic solidarity patterns (in Durkheim sense) into more complex social structures, often "aside" all scientific concepts of collective identification. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a Czech 
653 |a Romania 
653 |a cultural anthropology 
653 |a Balcan 
653 |a Czechs 
653 |a Bulgaria 
653 |a immigrants 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://antropologie.zcu.cz/media/document/balkan_a_migrace_2011.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41794  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication