Events, States and Times. An essay on narrative discourse in English
This monograph investigates the temporal interpretation of narrative discourse in two parts. The theme of the first part is narrative progression. It begins with a case study of the adverb 'now' and its interaction with the meaning of tense. The case study motivates an ontological distinct...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_47117 | ||
005 | 20210211 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210211s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783110485912 | ||
020 | |a 9783110485912 | ||
020 | |a 9783110486452 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783110485912 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | |a Altshuler, Daniel |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Events, States and Times. An essay on narrative discourse in English |
260 | |b De Gruyter |c 2016 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (x, 176 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a This monograph investigates the temporal interpretation of narrative discourse in two parts. The theme of the first part is narrative progression. It begins with a case study of the adverb 'now' and its interaction with the meaning of tense. The case study motivates an ontological distinction between events, states and times and proposes that 'now' seeks a prominent state that holds throughout the time described by the tense. Building on prior research, prominence is shown to be influenced by principles of discourse coherence and two coherence principles, NARRATION and RESULT, are given a formally explicit characterization. The key innovation is a new method for testing the definitional adequacy of NARRATION and RESULT, namely by an abductive argument. This contribution opens a new way of thinking about how eventive and stative descriptions contribute to the perceived narrative progression in a discourse. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
653 | |a narrative progression | ||
653 | |a abduction | ||
653 | |a discourse coherence | ||
653 | |a rhetorical relations | ||
653 | |a states | ||
653 | |a attitude reports | ||
653 | |a indexicality | ||
653 | |a indirect speech | ||
653 | |a times | ||
653 | |a anaphora | ||
653 | |a Events | ||
653 | |a aspect | ||
653 | |a sequence of tense | ||
653 | |a tense | ||
653 | |a adverbs | ||
653 | |a deixis | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110485912 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47117 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |