Evoluzione della scienza e giudizio di rimproverabilità per colpa Verso una nuova tipicità del crimen culposum

The growing complexity of production phenomena is causing a progressive expansion of culpable liability assumptions. In particular, the jurisprudence dealing with long-term diseases bases the culpable reproach on scientific knowledge gained in a later period, thus operating a destructuring of the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cecilia Valbonesi (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:No linguistic content
Published: Firenze University Press 2014
Series:Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_47153
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2014 xx |||||o ||| 0|||| d
020 |a 978-88-6655-712-8 
020 |a 9788866557128 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-6655-712-8  |c doi 
041 0 |a zxx 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Cecilia Valbonesi  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Evoluzione della scienza e giudizio di rimproverabilità per colpa  |b Verso una nuova tipicità del crimen culposum 
260 |b Firenze University Press  |c 2014 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (228 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze» 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The growing complexity of production phenomena is causing a progressive expansion of culpable liability assumptions. In particular, the jurisprudence dealing with long-term diseases bases the culpable reproach on scientific knowledge gained in a later period, thus operating a destructuring of the constitutive profiles of the <i>crimen culposum</i>. The work intends to investigate the complex relationship between guilt and scientific progress, highlighting the continuous dialogue between doctrine and jurisprudence, with particular attention to the implications of risk criminal law and precautionism. The search for a new typicality of culpable reproach does not ignore the recent legislative developments aimed at giving meaning to guidelines and protocols. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.fupress.com/redir.ashx?RetUrl=2827_7404.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/47153  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication