From Is to Ought: The Place of Normative Models in the Study of Human Thought
In the study of human thinking, two main research questions can be asked: "Descriptive Q: What is human thinking like? Normative Q: What ought human thinking be like?" For decades, these two questions have dominated the field, and the relationship between them generated many a controversy....
Saved in:
Main Author: | David E. Over (auth) |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Shira Elqayam (auth) |
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media SA
2016
|
Series: | Frontiers Research Topics
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?
by: Gorka Navarrete
Published: (2016) -
Judgment and Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Perspectives
Published: (2019) -
Normative Paradoxien Verkehrungen des gesellschaftlichen Fortschritts
Published: (2021) -
Normative Paradoxien Verkehrungen des gesellschaftlichen Fortschritts
Published: (2021) -
Lived Culture and Psychology: Sharedness and Normativity as Discursive, Embodied and Affective Engagements with the World in Social Interaction
Published: (2020)