Homo oeconomicus". Paradigma, critiche, revisioni
Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of <i>homo oeconomicus</i> which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view...
Zapisane w:
1. autor: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektroniczne Rozdział |
Język: | brak treści o charakterze lingwistycznym |
Wydane: |
Firenze University Press
2012
|
Seria: | Studi e saggi
|
Hasła przedmiotowe: | |
Dostęp online: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Etykiety: |
Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
|
Streszczenie: | Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of <i>homo oeconomicus</i> which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the <i>methodological hypotheses</i>, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the <i>weak anthropologies</i>, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the <i>extreme versions</i>, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness. |
---|---|
Opis fizyczny: | 1 electronic resource (194 p.) |
ISBN: | 978-88-6655-107-2 9788866551072 |
Ograniczenie dostępu: | Open Access |