Homo oeconomicus". Paradigma, critiche, revisioni

Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of <i>homo oeconomicus</i> which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sergio Caruso (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:No linguistic content
Published: Firenze University Press 2012
Series:Studi e saggi
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_49547
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|||| d
020 |a 978-88-6655-107-2 
020 |a 9788866551072 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-6655-107-2  |c doi 
041 0 |a zxx 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HP  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Sergio Caruso  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Homo oeconomicus". Paradigma, critiche, revisioni 
260 |b Firenze University Press  |c 2012 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (194 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Studi e saggi 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Pantaleoni and Pareto re-established economic theory on the basis of <i>homo oeconomicus</i> which, despite criticisms, went on to become a strangely popular concept, not only among economists, but even in common parlance, where it has assumed a confusing variety of meanings. With a view to setting things in order, this book distinguishes: the <i>methodological hypotheses</i>, which could possibly be corrected on the basis of new economic psychology; the <i>weak anthropologies</i>, retrievable as 'given abstractions' within typical contexts; and finally the <i>extreme versions</i>, that reduce human nature to absolute egoism. The author makes a radical criticism of the latter, drawing upon the extensive tools derived from psychology, philosophical anthropology and political philosophy, and thus succeeds in demonstrating their lack of empirical foundation, their conceptual inconsistency and their ideological dangerousness. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
650 7 |a Philosophy  |2 bicssc 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://www.fupress.com/redir.ashx?RetUrl=2379_21435.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/49547  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication