How best to 'go on'? Prospects for a 'Modern Synthesis in the sciences of mind

Psychology straddles areas from the biological to the social and cultural. Within that vast range, there have been recent explosions of interest in neuropsychology, genetics and epigenetics, and the evolutionary bases of mindedness. Correspondingly, there have been conceptual innovations and new emp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Cromby (auth)
Other Authors: Kevin Moore (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2016
Series:Frontiers Research Topics
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_49588
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-2-88919-906-8 
020 |a 9782889199068 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.3389/978-2-88919-906-8  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JM  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a John Cromby  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Kevin Moore  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a How best to 'go on'? Prospects for a 'Modern Synthesis in the sciences of mind 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2016 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (91 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Frontiers Research Topics 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Psychology straddles areas from the biological to the social and cultural. Within that vast range, there have been recent explosions of interest in neuropsychology, genetics and epigenetics, and the evolutionary bases of mindedness. Correspondingly, there have been conceptual innovations and new empirical evidence in relation to the embodied, social and discursive processes supporting mind and personhood. Simultaneously, awareness of developmental processes and their dynamic interweaving of genetic, physiological, neurological, social and cultural elements has also increased. Might such developments help 'connect the dots' between diverse aspects of mindedness and the contexts within which it arises? Whilst it seems clear that mind is co-constituted of both biological and socio-cultural processes, how might we bring these disparate realms of knowledge together? In a number of these areas, suggestive integrative possibilities have been explored (e.g., predictive processing, embodied and situated cognition, dynamic developmental systems theory) and insights such as a focus on action, 'knowledge as skills', embeddedness and connectivity have been pursued across a range of disciplines. This edited collection of articles bring together such possibilities - and others - in the same forum in order to provide an opportunity to re-visit a recurring discussion within theoretical psychology: The claimed lack of - and potential for - theoretical synthesis and unity. While the chapters range over a number of areas of research, this collection is focused on current prospects for conceptual synthesis within - or convergence of research between - aspects of mind and mindedness. As is clear from the contributions, it highlights integrative conceptual proposals that emphasize action-orientation, process, embeddedness and connectivity - especially between explanatory 'levels'. Beyond specific proposals for integration, several of the contributions explicitly or implicitly expose broader questions about the purpose of psychological research, the epistemological and ontological commitments required, and the relevant social, political and economic contexts within which such research is performed. This is perhaps inevitable since any aim for synthesis of various understandings of mind will - or should - lead to consideration of the general implications, beyond the 'science', that follow from an integrated account of mind and mindedness. Whether or not the contributions in this volume provide insights into profitable paths towards greater theoretical synthesis in the sciences of mind or, alternatively, provide grist for the mill of renewed skepticism over the potential or even desirability of such synthesis is unpredictable. Whichever the outcome, we feel sure that they will help provoke future productive research in, and thinking about, the sciences of mind. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Psychology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Levels of explanation 
653 |a Enactivism 
653 |a Argumentation 
653 |a Theoretical synthesis 
653 |a Reciprocity 
653 |a multi-level systems 
653 |a neurophenomenology 
653 |a Developmental Systems Theory 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1976/how-best-to-go-on-prospects-for-a-modern-synthesis-in-the-sciences-of-mind  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/49588  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication