Invisible, but how? The depth of unconscious processing as inferred from different suppression techniques

To what level are invisible stimuli processed by the brain in the absence of conscious awareness? It is widely accepted that simple visual properties of invisible stimuli are processed; however, the existence of higher-level unconscious processing (e.g., involving semantic or executive functions) re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nathan Faivre (auth)
Other Authors: Julien Dubois (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2015
Series:Frontiers Research Topics
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_50647
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2015 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-2-88919-420-9 
020 |a 9782889194209 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.3389/978-2-88919-420-9  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JM  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Nathan Faivre  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Julien Dubois  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Invisible, but how? The depth of unconscious processing as inferred from different suppression techniques 
260 |b Frontiers Media SA  |c 2015 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (143 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Frontiers Research Topics 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a To what level are invisible stimuli processed by the brain in the absence of conscious awareness? It is widely accepted that simple visual properties of invisible stimuli are processed; however, the existence of higher-level unconscious processing (e.g., involving semantic or executive functions) remains a matter of debate. Several methodological factors may underlie the discrepancies found in the literature, such as different levels of conservativeness in the definition of "unconscious" or different dependent measures of unconscious processing. In this research topic, we are particularly interested in yet another factor: inherent differences in the amount of information let through by different suppression techniques. In the same conditions of well-controlled, conservatively established invisibility, can we show that some of the techniques in the "psychophysical magic" arsenal (e.g., masking, but also visual crowding, attentional blink, etc.) reliably lead to higher-level unconscious processing than others (e.g., interocular suppression)? Some authors have started investigating this question, using multiple techniques in similar settings . We argue that this approach should be extended and refined. Indeed, in order to delineate the frontiers of the unconscious mind using a contrastive method, one has to disentangle the limits attributable to unawareness itself, and those attributable to the technique inducing unawareness. The scope of this research topic is to provide a platform for scientists to contribute insights and further experiments addressing this fundamental question. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Psychology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) 
653 |a psychophysical magic 
653 |a unconscious processing 
653 |a visual crowding 
653 |a backward masking 
653 |a measures of consciousness 
653 |a interocular suppression 
653 |a invisibility 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u http://journal.frontiersin.org/researchtopic/1882/invisible-but-how-the-depth-of-unconscious-processing-as-inferred-from-different-suppression-techniq  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/50647  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication