Measures of Spirituality/Religiosity-Description of Concepts and Validation of Instruments

• Main Author: Büssing, Arndt (auth)
• Format: Electronic Book Chapter
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2019
• Subjects: Religion & beliefs; religious trust; n/a; healthy persons; religion and health; bereavement; psychometric properties; meaning making; Katz-Francis Scale of Attitude toward Judaism; quantitative measure; measures; religiosity; children; medical ethics; life satisfaction; communication; validation; struggle; needs; well-being; SHALOM; spirituality; DUREL; anxiety; spiritual crisis; latent; Reliance on God's help; physician values; Judaism; quality of life; attitude; distress; questionnaire; faith; affective religiosity; measurement; spiritual struggle; Buddhism; spiritual well-being; psychology; China; complicated grief; God; complicated spiritual grief; bifactor; RCI-10; religion; spiritual care; assess; chronic illness; confirmatory factor analysis; cancer; depression; Australia
• Online Access: DOAB: download the publication; DOAB: description of the publication

Why do we need more questionnaires to measure aspects of spirituality/religiosity when we already have so many well-tried instruments in use? One answer is that research in this field is growing and that new research questions continuously do arise. Several of these new questions cannot be easily answered with the instruments designed for previous questions. The field is expanding and, consequently, the research topics. Meanwhile several multidimensional instruments were developed which cover existential, prosocial, religious and non-religious forms of spirituality, hope, peace and trust—and several more. The ‘disadvantage’ of these instruments is the fact that some are conceptually broad and often rather unspecific, but they might be suited quite well for culturally and spiritually diverse populations when the intention is to compare such diverse groups. This is the reason why more research on new instruments is needed as can be found in this Special Issue, and to stimulate a critical debate about their pros and cons.