Original Forgiveness

In Original Forgiveness, Nicolas de Warren challenges the widespread assumption that forgiveness is always a response to something that has incited it. Rather than considering forgiveness exclusively in terms of an encounter between individuals or groups after injury, he argues that availability for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Warren, Nicolas (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Northwestern University Press 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_55435
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780810142800 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPS  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a de Warren, Nicolas  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Original Forgiveness 
260 |b Northwestern University Press  |c 2020 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (296 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In Original Forgiveness, Nicolas de Warren challenges the widespread assumption that forgiveness is always a response to something that has incited it. Rather than considering forgiveness exclusively in terms of an encounter between individuals or groups after injury, he argues that availability for the possibility of forgiveness represents an original forgiveness, an essential condition for the prospect of human relations. De Warren develops this notion of original forgiveness through a reflection on the indispensability of trust for human existence, as well as an examination of the refusal or unavailability to forgive in the aftermath of moral harms.De Warren engages in a critical discussion of philosophical figures, including Martin Heidegger, Hannah Arendt, Mikhail Bakhtin, Edmund Husserl, Gabriel Marcel, Emmanuel Levinas, and Jean Améry, and of literary works by William Shakespeare, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Heinrich von Kleist, Simon Wiesenthal, Herman Melville, and Maurice Sendak. He uses this discussion to show that in trusting another person, we must trust in ourselves to remain available to the possibility of forgiveness for those occasions when the other person betrays a trust, without thereby forgiving anything in advance. Original forgiveness is to remain the other person's keeper-even when the other has caused harm. Likewise, being another's keeper calls upon an original beseeching for forgiveness, given the inevitable possibility of blemish or betrayal. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Social & political philosophy  |2 bicssc 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/79113  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/55435  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication