Património Urbanístico e Planeamento da Salvaguarda

Urban heritage took four hundred years to establish itself as a cultural asset to be safeguarded and evolved along an historicalsocial process, rooted in the idea that urban sets and monumental architecture are part of the same category of historical values. In the second half of the nineteenth cent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adelino Gonçalves (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:Portuguese
Published: Coimbra University Press 2018
Series:Olhares
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_55817
005 20210211
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210211s2018 xx |||||o ||| 0|por d
020 |a 978-989-26-1457-1 
020 |a 9789892614564 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.14195/978-989-26-1457-1  |c doi 
041 0 |a por 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Adelino Gonçalves  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Património Urbanístico e Planeamento da Salvaguarda 
260 |b Coimbra University Press  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (356 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Olhares 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Urban heritage took four hundred years to establish itself as a cultural asset to be safeguarded and evolved along an historicalsocial process, rooted in the idea that urban sets and monumental architecture are part of the same category of historical values. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the notion of heritage stretched up and reached an urban dimension, but its social and political understanding did not release itself from theories and practices of intervention and safeguard action established within the architectural dimension from which came from. Aiming to contain change, they continue to resist to accept that change it is part of the nature of cities and to integrate it into the very meaning of the urban dimension of heritage. After all, of what do we talk about when we talk about urban heritage? Arising from various stimuli, this question guided the texts gathered here. They were written with different disciplinary perspectives because the measure that differentiates the urban dimension of heritage and architectural dimension is not metric or geometric. It is ontological and can only be understood in an integrated manner. In development, of course. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a Portuguese 
653 |a Portuguese 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1457-1  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/55817  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication