Universality in Set Theories. A Study in Formal Ontology
The book discusses the fate of universality and a universal set in several set theories. The book aims at a philosophical study of ontological and conceptual questions around set theory. Set theories are ontologies. They posit sets and claim that these exhibit the essential properties laid down in t...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2010
|
Series: | Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_61623 | ||
005 | 20210212 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210212s2010 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783110326109 | ||
020 | |a 9783110326109 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783110326109 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a HP |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Bremer, Manuel |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Universality in Set Theories. A Study in Formal Ontology |
260 | |b De Gruyter |c 2010 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (125 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Philosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a The book discusses the fate of universality and a universal set in several set theories. The book aims at a philosophical study of ontological and conceptual questions around set theory. Set theories are ontologies. They posit sets and claim that these exhibit the essential properties laid down in the set theoretical axioms. Collecting these postulated entities quantified over poses the problem of universality. Is the collection of the set theoretical entities itself a set theoretical entity? What does it mean if it is, and what does it mean if it is not? To answer these questions involves developing a theory of the universal set. We have to ask: Are there different aspects to universality in set theory, which stand in conflict to each other? May inconsistency be the price to pay to circumvent ineffability? And most importantly: How far can axiomatic ontology take us out of the problems around universality? | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Philosophy |2 bicssc | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110326109 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/61623 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |