Revisiting the Relevance of Conceptualism of Godard's film Journal for Religion, Film and Media

Jean-Luc Godard's filmmaking is analyzed as a conceptual art, as in agreement with his most accomplished role as a film critic, not a classical filmmaker. In his 1970 manifesto, Godard argues that 1) we must make political films, and 2) we must make films politically. While the first point prov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vuk Uskokovic (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Schüren Verlag 2018
Series:Journal for Religion, Film and Media
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_63156
005 20210212
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210212s2018 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 05.4:2018.2.1 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.25364/05.4:2018.2.1  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Vuk Uskokovic  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Revisiting the Relevance of Conceptualism of Godard's film  |b Journal for Religion, Film and Media 
260 |b Schüren Verlag  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (83-113 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Journal for Religion, Film and Media 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Jean-Luc Godard's filmmaking is analyzed as a conceptual art, as in agreement with his most accomplished role as a film critic, not a classical filmmaker. In his 1970 manifesto, Godard argues that 1) we must make political films, and 2) we must make films politically. While the first point provokes a constructive critique of the art of cinema, the other one leads to the provision of an absolute cinematic experience. Correspondingly, it is argued that albeit rare and systematically unsupported in the academic setting, a most prolific scientific work is such that it implicitly questions the dominant presentation styles and methodological paradigms in parallel with providing meaningful basic and/or practical findings. The relevance of other elements of Godard's conceptual approach to revolutionizing the art of cinema to scientific studies is elaborated too. The importance of ad hoc improvisation, deliberate imperfectness, the aesthetics of poverty, the embracement of collective uncertainties and the eagerness to constantly get lost to be found is particularly emphasized. "I don't make movies; I make cinema" is Godard's precept whose translation to any professional field, including scientific research and teaching, could produce uncountable benefits. Godard's art is intimately tied to the iteration of the point that the value of an act is measured by the extent to which it reaches out away from the subject and into the world, correlating with the Buberian ontology. Corresponding annihilations of the protagonists symbolize the necessity of the artist's working against the self in the attempt to use her art to destroy the art in question and point at everything as an equally precious art. The discourse follows an impulsive and unstructured course so as to veritably reflect Godard's approach to filmmaking. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
773 1 0 |t "Who, Being Loved, Is Poor?" - Material and Media Dimensions of Weddings  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: 59b107e4-271c-436d-bd59-398b42d17d3b 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://jrfm.eu/index.php/ojs_jrfm/article/view/116  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63156  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication