Chapter 13 The Role of Neuroscience in Precise, Precautionary, and Probabilistic Accounts of Sentience

Given that there is currently no consensus as to exactly which animals are sentient, how should we make moral decisions when we are uncertain as to which of the animals influenced by that decision are sentient? And how relevant is evidence from the neurosciences for making these decisions? In this c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_63969
005 20210310
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210310s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PSAN  |2 bicssc 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 13 The Role of Neuroscience in Precise, Precautionary, and Probabilistic Accounts of Sentience 
260 |b Springer Nature  |c 2020 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (13 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Given that there is currently no consensus as to exactly which animals are sentient, how should we make moral decisions when we are uncertain as to which of the animals influenced by that decision are sentient? And how relevant is evidence from the neurosciences for making these decisions? In this chapter, I outline three different approaches toward incorporating uncertainty about sentience into moral decision-making: what I call precise, precautionary, and probabilistic approaches to sentience. I suggest that neuroscientific evidence has different relevance for each of these accounts. Precautionary approaches should be adopted to provide basic protections for animals even when we are uncertain about their sentience, but probabilistic accounts are more relevant for decisions where we need to carefully weigh positive and negative consequences of different possible decisions. Precise accounts can be useful for providing guidance but are not directly relevant for making decisions or guiding policy. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Neurosciences  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Sentience, Consciousness, Arguments by analogy, Precautionary principle 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: Neuroethics and Nonhuman Animals 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47111/1/Bookshelf_NBK555334.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47111/1/Bookshelf_NBK555334.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63969  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication