Chapter 13 The Role of Neuroscience in Precise, Precautionary, and Probabilistic Accounts of Sentience
Given that there is currently no consensus as to exactly which animals are sentient, how should we make moral decisions when we are uncertain as to which of the animals influenced by that decision are sentient? And how relevant is evidence from the neurosciences for making these decisions? In this c...
Saved in:
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_63969 | ||
005 | 20210310 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210310s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a PSAN |2 bicssc | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter 13 The Role of Neuroscience in Precise, Precautionary, and Probabilistic Accounts of Sentience |
260 | |b Springer Nature |c 2020 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (13 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a Given that there is currently no consensus as to exactly which animals are sentient, how should we make moral decisions when we are uncertain as to which of the animals influenced by that decision are sentient? And how relevant is evidence from the neurosciences for making these decisions? In this chapter, I outline three different approaches toward incorporating uncertainty about sentience into moral decision-making: what I call precise, precautionary, and probabilistic approaches to sentience. I suggest that neuroscientific evidence has different relevance for each of these accounts. Precautionary approaches should be adopted to provide basic protections for animals even when we are uncertain about their sentience, but probabilistic accounts are more relevant for decisions where we need to carefully weigh positive and negative consequences of different possible decisions. Precise accounts can be useful for providing guidance but are not directly relevant for making decisions or guiding policy. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Neurosciences |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Sentience, Consciousness, Arguments by analogy, Precautionary principle | ||
773 | 1 | 0 | |7 nnaa |o OAPEN Library UUID: Neuroethics and Nonhuman Animals |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47111/1/Bookshelf_NBK555334.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47111/1/Bookshelf_NBK555334.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63969 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |