Britain's Second Embassy to China Lord Amherst's 'Special Mission' to the Jiaqing Emperor in 1816

Lord Amherst's diplomatic mission to the Qing Court in 1816 was the second British embassy to China. The first led by Lord Macartney in 1793 had failed to achieve its goals. It was thought that Amherst had better prospects of success, but the intense diplomatic encounter that greeted his arriva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stevenson, Caroline (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Canberra ANU Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_64032
005 20210316
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210316s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a BSEC.2020 
020 |a 9781760464097 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.22459/BSEC.2020  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HBJD1  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a HBJF  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a HBLL  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Stevenson, Caroline  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Britain's Second Embassy to China  |b Lord Amherst's 'Special Mission' to the Jiaqing Emperor in 1816 
260 |a Canberra  |b ANU Press  |c 2021 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (404 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Lord Amherst's diplomatic mission to the Qing Court in 1816 was the second British embassy to China. The first led by Lord Macartney in 1793 had failed to achieve its goals. It was thought that Amherst had better prospects of success, but the intense diplomatic encounter that greeted his arrival ended badly. Amherst never appeared before the Jiaqing emperor and his embassy was expelled from Peking on the day it arrived. Historians have blamed Amherst for this outcome, citing his over-reliance on the advice of his Second Commissioner, Sir George Thomas Staunton, not to kowtow before the emperor. Detailed analysis of British sources reveal that Amherst was well informed on the kowtow issue and made his own decision for which he took full responsibility. Success was always unlikely because of irreconcilable differences in approach. China's conduct of foreign relations based on the tributary system required submission to the emperor, thus relegating all foreign emissaries and the rulers they represented to vassal status, whereas British diplomatic practice was centred on negotiation and Westphalian principles of equality between nations. The Amherst embassy's failure revised British assessments of China and led some observers to believe that force, rather than diplomacy, might be required in future to achieve British goals. The Opium War of 1840 that followed set a precedent for foreign interference in China, resulting in a century of 'humiliation'. This resonates today in President Xi Jinping's call for 'National Rejuvenation' to restore China's historic place at the centre of a new Sino-centric global order. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a British & Irish history  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Asian history  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Modern history to 20th century: c 1700 to c 1900  |2 bicssc 
653 |a China 
653 |a Britain 
653 |a British Empire 
653 |a William Pitt 
653 |a Amherst 
653 |a Canton 
653 |a Kowtow 
653 |a tributary system 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47329/1/book.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64032  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication