European Consensus between Strategy and Principle The Uses of Vertically Comparative Legal Reasoning in Regional Human Rights Adjudication
This study offers a critical account of the reasoning employed by the European Court of Human Rights, particularly its references to European consensus. Based on an in-depth analysis of the Court's case-law against the backdrop of human rights theory, it will be of interest to both practitioner...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Theilen, Jens T. (auth) |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Baden-Baden
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG
2021
|
Series: | Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht,
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Die zeitliche Wirkung von Urteilen des EuGH Maßgaben des Unionsrechts und Reaktionsmöglichkeiten mitgliedstaatlicher Gerichte
by: Riegger, Stephan
Published: (2021) -
Abweichungsfeste Verfassungsgrundsätze des Unionsrechts als ordre public-Vorbehalt gegenüber dem Völkerrecht
by: Tamblé, Philipp
Published: (2021) -
Illegalisierte Migration Die (De-)Konstruktion migrationsspezifischer Illegalitäten im Unionsrecht
by: Klarmann, Tobias
Published: (2021) -
Perspectives on Platform Regulation Concepts and Models of Social Media Governance | Across the Globe
Published: (2021) -
Persuasion and Legal Reasoning in the ECtHR Rulings Balancing Impossible Demands
by: Mężykowska, Aleksandra
Published: (2023)