Negotiating Asylum The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection
How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the founda...
Saved in:
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brill
2000
|
Series: | The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_68105 | ||
005 | 20210423 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210423s2000 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789004461543 | ||
020 | |a 9789004461543 | ||
020 | |a 9789041114310 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/9789004461543 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a LBBR |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Noll, Gregor |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Noll, Gregor |4 oth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Negotiating Asylum |b The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection |
260 | |b Brill |c 2000 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (644 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational oppositions embedded in migration and asylum issues? This work combines the potential of legal formalism with an analytical framework drawing on political theory. It analyses the argumentative strategies used by international lawyers, and developed them further, exploiting the interpretative methodology of international law as well as elaborate discrimination arguments. The author concludes that deflecting protection seekers by means of visa requirements may constitute a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the prescriptions of international law oblige Member States to apply the Dublin Convention and the Spanish Protocol in a manner emptying it of its main control functions. The author also shows that burden-sharing remains the pivotal element in the normative dynamics behind the EU acquis, and explains why the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded as the only transnational forum for the legitimate negotiation of asylum in Europe. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a International human rights law |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a International human rights law | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/48335/1/9789004461543.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/68105 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |