Negotiating Asylum The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection

How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the founda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Noll, Gregor (Editor)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Brill 2000
Series:The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_68105
005 20210423
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210423s2000 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9789004461543 
020 |a 9789004461543 
020 |a 9789041114310 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1163/9789004461543  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a LBBR  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Noll, Gregor  |4 edt 
700 1 |a Noll, Gregor  |4 oth 
245 1 0 |a Negotiating Asylum  |b The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection 
260 |b Brill  |c 2000 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (644 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a The Raoul Wallenberg Institute Human Rights Library 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational oppositions embedded in migration and asylum issues? This work combines the potential of legal formalism with an analytical framework drawing on political theory. It analyses the argumentative strategies used by international lawyers, and developed them further, exploiting the interpretative methodology of international law as well as elaborate discrimination arguments. The author concludes that deflecting protection seekers by means of visa requirements may constitute a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the prescriptions of international law oblige Member States to apply the Dublin Convention and the Spanish Protocol in a manner emptying it of its main control functions. The author also shows that burden-sharing remains the pivotal element in the normative dynamics behind the EU acquis, and explains why the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded as the only transnational forum for the legitimate negotiation of asylum in Europe. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a International human rights law  |2 bicssc 
653 |a International human rights law 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/48335/1/9789004461543.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/68105  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication