Chapter 12 Partiality for Humanity and Enhancement

We consider a strategy for justifying bio-conservative opposition to enhancement according to which we should resist radical departures from human nature, not because human nature possesses any intrinsic value, but because it is our nature. The idea is that we can be partial to humanity in the same...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pugh, Jonathan (auth)
Other Authors: Kahane, Guy (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_70862
005 20210210
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210210s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a PSB  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Pugh, Jonathan  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Kahane, Guy  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 12 Partiality for Humanity and Enhancement 
260 |a Oxford  |b Oxford University Press  |c 2016 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (11 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a We consider a strategy for justifying bio-conservative opposition to enhancement according to which we should resist radical departures from human nature, not because human nature possesses any intrinsic value, but because it is our nature. The idea is that we can be partial to humanity in the same way that common sense morality allows us to be partial to self, family, lovers, friends or our country. Whilst a similar idea was suggested by Bernard Williams and Jerry Cohen, it was not fully developed, and their arguments fail to mount a serious challenge to many forms of enhancement. We explore a better approach, drawing on recent literature about the nature and grounds of partiality, and attempt to elucidate what partiality for humanity might plausibly involve. We argue, however, that even if such partiality for humanity is defensible, it can at most only set limits on enhancement. 
536 |a Wellcome Trust 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Biochemistry  |2 bicssc 
653 |a human enhancement; bioconservatives 
773 1 0 |t The Ethics of Human Enhancement  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: d838646d-27cb-4a52-9db1-596c316ade7e 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49607/1/Bookshelf_NBK401922.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49607/1/Bookshelf_NBK401922.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70862  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication