Chapter 10 Enhancing Conservatism
Debate between bioliberals (who adopt a permissive view about human enhancement) and bioconservatives (who oppose it) often fails to be constructive, since bioliberals are often dismissive of the conservative values to which bioconservatives frequently appeal. As a result, bioconservative opposition...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_70864 | ||
| 005 | 20210210 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20210210s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a PSB |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Roache, Rebecca |4 auth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Savulescu, Julian |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter 10 Enhancing Conservatism |
| 260 | |a Oxford |b Oxford University Press |c 2016 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (13 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Debate between bioliberals (who adopt a permissive view about human enhancement) and bioconservatives (who oppose it) often fails to be constructive, since bioliberals are often dismissive of the conservative values to which bioconservatives frequently appeal. As a result, bioconservative opposition to enhancement remains poorly understood by bioliberals. We attempt to increase this understanding first by identifying conservative values underlying bioconservative opposition to enhancement, and second by considering on what grounds bioconservatives might object to the biological enhancement of bioconservative values. By identifying grounds that appeal to values shared by both bioconservatives and bioliberals, we aim to provide a platform on which human enhancement can be constructively debated by bioliberals and bioconservatives. We close by focusing on Mill's arguments in favour of originality as possible support for bioconservative argument. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Biochemistry |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a bioliberals; bioconservatives; human enhancement | ||
| 773 | 1 | 0 | |t The Ethics of Human Enhancement |7 nnaa |o OAPEN Library UUID: d838646d-27cb-4a52-9db1-596c316ade7e |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49606/1/Bookshelf_NBK401923.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/49606/1/Bookshelf_NBK401923.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70864 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |