Embodiment and everyday cyborgs Technologies that alter subjectivity
"Using a range of social science methods and drawing on the sociology of the body, biomedicine and technology, Haddow invites readers of 'Embodiment and everyday cyborgs' to consider whether they might prefer organs from other humans or non-human animals (known as xenotransplantation)...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Manchester
Manchester University Press
2021
|
Series: | Inscriptions
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_70871 | ||
005 | 20210619 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20210619s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a UYQ |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a PDR |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Haddow, Gill |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Embodiment and everyday cyborgs |b Technologies that alter subjectivity |
260 | |a Manchester |b Manchester University Press |c 2021 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (208 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Inscriptions | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a "Using a range of social science methods and drawing on the sociology of the body, biomedicine and technology, Haddow invites readers of 'Embodiment and everyday cyborgs' to consider whether they might prefer organs from other humans or non-human animals (known as xenotransplantation), or implantable 'cybernetic' technologies to replace their own? In discovering that individuals have a very clear preference for human organs but not for the non-human, Haddow suggests that the inside of our bodies may be more important to our sense of identity than may have previously been thought. Whereas organs from other (once) living bodies can contaminate the body of the recipient (simultaneously altering subjectivity so they inherit traits e.g. gender), cybernetic technology is acclimatised to and becomes part of the body and subjectivity. In organ transplantation the organ has the potential to alter subjectivity - whereas with cybernetic technology it does not alter identity but is incorporated into existing subjectivity. Technologies are clean from previous organic fleshy associations and although they may malfunction or cause infection, they do not alter identity in the way that an organ might. Yet, we are arguably creating a 21st-century identity crisis through an increasing reliance on cybernetic technologies such as implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) creating new forms of 'un-health' and a new category of patient called 'everyday cyborgs' who have to develop strategies to incorporate device alienation as well as reinserting human agency over ICD activation. " | ||
536 | |a Wellcome Trust | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Artificial intelligence |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Impact of science & technology on society |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Cyborgs; xenotransplantation; body modification; phenomenology; cartesian dualism; sociology of the body; biomedicine; cybernetic system; identity; organ transplantation | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49619 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70871 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |