Embodiment and everyday cyborgs Technologies that alter subjectivity

"Using a range of social science methods and drawing on the sociology of the body, biomedicine and technology, Haddow invites readers of 'Embodiment and everyday cyborgs' to consider whether they might prefer organs from other humans or non-human animals (known as xenotransplantation)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haddow, Gill (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Manchester Manchester University Press 2021
Series:Inscriptions
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_70871
005 20210619
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20210619s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a UYQ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a PDR  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Haddow, Gill  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Embodiment and everyday cyborgs  |b Technologies that alter subjectivity 
260 |a Manchester  |b Manchester University Press  |c 2021 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (208 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Inscriptions 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a "Using a range of social science methods and drawing on the sociology of the body, biomedicine and technology, Haddow invites readers of 'Embodiment and everyday cyborgs' to consider whether they might prefer organs from other humans or non-human animals (known as xenotransplantation), or implantable 'cybernetic' technologies to replace their own? In discovering that individuals have a very clear preference for human organs but not for the non-human, Haddow suggests that the inside of our bodies may be more important to our sense of identity than may have previously been thought. Whereas organs from other (once) living bodies can contaminate the body of the recipient (simultaneously altering subjectivity so they inherit traits e.g. gender), cybernetic technology is acclimatised to and becomes part of the body and subjectivity. In organ transplantation the organ has the potential to alter subjectivity - whereas with cybernetic technology it does not alter identity but is incorporated into existing subjectivity. Technologies are clean from previous organic fleshy associations and although they may malfunction or cause infection, they do not alter identity in the way that an organ might. Yet, we are arguably creating a 21st-century identity crisis through an increasing reliance on cybernetic technologies such as implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) creating new forms of 'un-health' and a new category of patient called 'everyday cyborgs' who have to develop strategies to incorporate device alienation as well as reinserting human agency over ICD activation. " 
536 |a Wellcome Trust 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Artificial intelligence  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Impact of science & technology on society  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Cyborgs; xenotransplantation; body modification; phenomenology; cartesian dualism; sociology of the body; biomedicine; cybernetic system; identity; organ transplantation 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/49619  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/70871  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication