Extracting Accountability Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility

How engineers in the mining and oil and gas industries attempt to reconcile competing domains of public accountability. The growing movement toward corporate social responsibility (CSR) urges corporations to promote the well-being of people and the planet rather than the sole pursuit of profit. In E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, Jessica M. (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Cambridge The MIT Press 2021
Series:Engineering Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_78620
005 20220221
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220221s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780262366151 
020 |a 9780262542166 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a THT  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a PHDY  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a TQD  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Smith, Jessica M.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Extracting Accountability  |b Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility 
260 |a Cambridge  |b The MIT Press  |c 2021 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (328 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Engineering Studies 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a How engineers in the mining and oil and gas industries attempt to reconcile competing domains of public accountability. The growing movement toward corporate social responsibility (CSR) urges corporations to promote the well-being of people and the planet rather than the sole pursuit of profit. In Extracting Accountability, Jessica Smith investigates how the public accountability of corporations emerges from the everyday practices of the engineers who work for them. Focusing on engineers who view social responsibility as central to their profession, she finds the corporate context of their work prompts them to attempt to reconcile competing domains of accountability-to formal guidelines, standards, and policies; to professional ideals; to the public; and to themselves. Their efforts are complicated by the distributed agency they experience as corporate actors: they are not always authors of their actions and frequently act through others. Drawing on extensive interviews, archival research, and fieldwork, Smith traces the ways that engineers in the mining and oil and gas industries accounted for their actions to multiple publics-from critics of their industry to their own friends and families. She shows how the social license to operate and an underlying pragmatism lead engineers to ask how resource production can be done responsibly rather than whether it should be done at all. She analyzes the liminality of engineering consultants, who experienced greater professional autonomy but often felt hamstrung when positioned as outsiders. Finally, she explores how critical participation in engineering education can nurture new accountabilities and chart more sustainable resource futures. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f by-nc-nd/4.0  |2 cc  |4 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Energy efficiency  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Energy  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Environmental monitoring  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Energy technology and engineering 
653 |a Energy 
653 |a Environmental science, engineering and technology 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12677.001.0001  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/78620  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication