What Makes Writing Academic Rethinking Theory for Practice

This book argues that what makes writing academic emerges from socio-academic and historical practices rather than conventionalised stylistic, linguistic or syntactic forms. Using a critical realist lens, it re-imagines academic writings as 21st century open systems that change according to affordan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Molinari, Julia (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Bloomsbury Academic 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_79504
005 20220319
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220319s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781350243958 
020 |a 9781350243927 
020 |a 9781350243934 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.5040/9781350243958  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a CF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Molinari, Julia  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a What Makes Writing Academic  |b Rethinking Theory for Practice 
260 |b Bloomsbury Academic  |c 2022 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a This book argues that what makes writing academic emerges from socio-academic and historical practices rather than conventionalised stylistic, linguistic or syntactic forms. Using a critical realist lens, it re-imagines academic writings as 21st century open systems that change according to affordances perceived by writers. In so doing, the book offers opportunities for re-imagining how, which and whose knowledge emerges. Academic communication hinges on being able to write in certain forms but not others, which risks excluding knowledge that may lend itself to alternative forms of representation, including dialogues, chronicles, manifestos, blogs and comics. Moreover, because academic ability tends to be misleadingly conflated with writing ability, limiting how the academy writes to a relatively narrow set of forms (such as the essay or thesis), may be preventing a range of abilities from emerging. Standardised forms require abstracts, introductions, main bodies, and conclusions and are also predominantly monolingual and monomodal; this can narrow, distort or flatten epistemic representation and can lead to a range of epistemic losses and gains. Drawing on the history of academia, socio-semiotic research, integrational linguistics, and studies in multimodal and visual thinking, and presenting examples from a range of academic writers including students, the book proposes that academic writings be re-imagined as multimodal artefacts that harness a wider range of epistemic affordances. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a linguistics  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Language Arts & Disciplines 
653 |a Linguistics 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/53454/1/external_content.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/53454/14/9781350243934.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/53454/14/9781350243934.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/79504  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication