Chapter Assessment of agricultural productivity change at country level: A stochastic frontier approach

In this paper, we estimate agricultural productivity change at country level based on the same data employed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the current reference data source, using a stochastic frontier model instead of the growth accounting method. The use of a stochastic fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Magrini, Alessandro (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Florence Firenze University Press 2021
Series:Proceedings e report
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_83276
005 20220602
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220602s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 978-88-5518-461-8.37 
020 |a 9788855184618 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-5518-461-8.37  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Magrini, Alessandro  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter Assessment of agricultural productivity change at country level: A stochastic frontier approach 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2021 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (6 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Proceedings e report 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In this paper, we estimate agricultural productivity change at country level based on the same data employed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the current reference data source, using a stochastic frontier model instead of the growth accounting method. The use of a stochastic frontier model is motivated by the opportunity to overcome the limitation of USDA estimates which rely on approximated and imputed input cost shares, and of the growth accounting method in general, which ignores technical inefficiency. We found that, in general, USDA estimates are higher in absolute value than ours but in substantial agreement, confirming the different theoretical foundations of the two methods and suggesting the empirical validity of both of them. Furthermore, our results show that the assumption of constant returns to scale made by many authors appears just a simplification and not a real property of the production processes of the various countries. This work has the value to provide, for the first time in the literature, a comparison between agricultural productivity changes estimated with different methodologies, and an additional data source that can be employed in a large variety of longitudinal economic analyses at country level. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
653 |a agricultural TFP 
653 |a growth accounting 
653 |a Malmquist index 
653 |a technical efficiency 
653 |a translog production frontier 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/56349/1/26255.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83276  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication