Chapter Due autobiografie a confronto: Život i priključenija di Dositej Obradović e Žitije di Gerasim Zelić
Dositej Obradović's Život i priključenija is generally considered the symbolic herald of modern Serbian literature, a paradigmatic text which affected many later writers, including Gerasim Zelić. The paper compares Dositej's work and Zelić's Žitije focusing on three levels: firs...
Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Elektronik Kitap Bölümü |
| Dil: | İtalyanca |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Florence
Firenze University Press
2019
|
| Seri Bilgileri: | Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_83450 | ||
| 005 | 20220602 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20220602s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d | ||
| 020 | |a 978-88-6453-979-9.07 | ||
| 020 | |a 9788864539799 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.36253/978-88-6453-979-9.07 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a ita | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Leto, Maria Rita |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Chapter Due autobiografie a confronto: Život i priključenija di Dositej Obradović e Žitije di Gerasim Zelić |
| 260 | |a Florence |b Firenze University Press |c 2019 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (17 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici | |
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a Dositej Obradović's Život i priključenija is generally considered the symbolic herald of modern Serbian literature, a paradigmatic text which affected many later writers, including Gerasim Zelić. The paper compares Dositej's work and Zelić's Žitije focusing on three levels: firstly, it tracks the common topoi and the distinctive characteristics of the two texts; secondly, it discusses the ways in which Zelić reinterprets Dositej's model, especially with respect to autobiography and travelogue; finally, it elaborates on the different yet cognate notion of authorship the two texts propose. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a Italian | ||
| 653 | |a Serbian literature | ||
| 653 | |a autobiography | ||
| 653 | |a travel writing | ||
| 653 | |a Dositej Obradović | ||
| 653 | |a Gerasim Zelić | ||
| 773 | 1 | 0 | |7 nnaa |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/55973/1/26382.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83450 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |