Chapter Limiti alla crescita, universalismo e progresso sociale

The paradigm of limits to growth has been legitimized by important contributions, both scientific and philosophical. Although it has oriented the political program of the major ecological movements, its weakness is to be "negative" (placing constraints) and paternalistic (preaching to othe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bellanca, Nicolò (auth)
Other Authors: Pardi, Luca (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:Italian
Published: Florence Firenze University Press 2020
Series:Studi e saggi
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_83582
005 20220602
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220602s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d
020 |a 978-88-5518-195-2.11 
020 |a 9788855181952 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-5518-195-2.11  |c doi 
041 0 |a ita 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Bellanca, Nicolò  |4 auth 
700 1 |a Pardi, Luca  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter Limiti alla crescita, universalismo e progresso sociale 
260 |a Florence  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2020 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (14 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Studi e saggi 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The paradigm of limits to growth has been legitimized by important contributions, both scientific and philosophical. Although it has oriented the political program of the major ecological movements, its weakness is to be "negative" (placing constraints) and paternalistic (preaching to others what it would be right to do). We evaluate the weight of these criticisms by examining Ingrid Robeyns' recent refined version of it, according to which it would be efficient and right to put an upper limit on income and wealth. We then move on to criticize the universalist ideology that has always permeated the ecological paradigm, arguing that, ultimately, Humanity will be able to awaken and jointly face the ongoing crises. Evolutionary biology helps to account for the weakness of this approach: the human species reproduces by mixing conflict and cooperation on an individual and group level. Humans have always been divided into many tribes, which can collaborate, but which sometimes exist as they defend and affirm borders and identities. It is rather empty to imagine the ecumenical convergence of all humans on the same order of priorities. Finally, we distinguish between growth and social progress. We try to formulate a definition of progress that constitutes the premise for a more adequate narration of the story of our biosphere. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
546 |a Italian 
653 |a Limitarism 
653 |a ecologism 
653 |a eusociality 
653 |a polyarchic society 
653 |a social progress 
653 |a evolutionary biology 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/56225/1/15123.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83582  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication