Commento a «La bufera e altro» di Montale

Despite the indisputable richness of the Montalian bibliography, there still was no comment on a fundamental collection such as La bufera e altro, published, after a complex and protracted gestation, by Neri Pozza in 1956. The aim of this book is to fill that void, giving a first contribution to the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Romolini, Marica (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:Italian
Published: Firenze Firenze University Press 2012
Series:Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_83618
005 20220602
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220602s2012 xx |||||o ||| 0|ita d
020 |a 978-88-6655-136-2 
020 |a 9788866551362 
020 |a 9788892735880 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.36253/978-88-6655-136-2  |c doi 
041 0 |a ita 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a D  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a DS  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Romolini, Marica  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Commento a «La bufera e altro» di Montale 
260 |a Firenze  |b Firenze University Press  |c 2012 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (456 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze» 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Despite the indisputable richness of the Montalian bibliography, there still was no comment on a fundamental collection such as La bufera e altro, published, after a complex and protracted gestation, by Neri Pozza in 1956. The aim of this book is to fill that void, giving a first contribution to the exegesis of one of Montale's densest - and most difficult - works, where the poet draws the conclusions of a long research to restart his own inexhaustible search for new languages and imagery. Between preliminary introductions (proper essays) and notes, she tries to take stock of the matter by comparing the various existing critical hypotheses and proposing - in a close hand-to-hand with the text, verse by verse, problematising rather than glossing over - an original interpretative line. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ 
546 |a Italian 
650 7 |a Literature & literary studies  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Literature: history & criticism  |2 bicssc 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/55055/1/9788866551362.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/83618  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication