Public Space in Transition Co-production and Co-management of Privately Owned Public Space in Seoul and Berlin
Teheran-ro in Seoul and Mediaspree area in Berlin are pristine examples for public spaces with a history of rapid change in the context of broader political and economic transitions. Dahae Lee shows that in such a transitional context, the public sector alone is incapable to provide and manage publi...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bielefeld
transcript Verlag
2022
|
Series: | Urban Studies
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_84367 | ||
005 | 20220621 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20220621s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 9783839462324 | ||
020 | |a 9783839462324 | ||
020 | |a 9783837662320 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783839462324 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a RPC |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a JFSG |2 bicssc | |
072 | 7 | |a RGC |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Lee, Dahae |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Public Space in Transition |b Co-production and Co-management of Privately Owned Public Space in Seoul and Berlin |
260 | |a Bielefeld |b transcript Verlag |c 2022 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (202 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Urban Studies | |
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a Teheran-ro in Seoul and Mediaspree area in Berlin are pristine examples for public spaces with a history of rapid change in the context of broader political and economic transitions. Dahae Lee shows that in such a transitional context, the public sector alone is incapable to provide and manage public space. Hence, it engages private sector entities in the form of privately owned public space/s (POPS). By analysing the planning instruments used for POPS in both cases, their uniqueness as well as strengths and weaknesses are revealed. Based on the results this study offers a number of policy recommendations for cities that encounter similar problems. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Urban & municipal planning |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Urban communities |2 bicssc | |
650 | 7 | |a Human geography |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Public Space Governance | ||
653 | |a Privately Owned Public Space | ||
653 | |a Co-production | ||
653 | |a Co-management | ||
653 | |a Planning Instrument | ||
653 | |a Space | ||
653 | |a City | ||
653 | |a Urban Planning | ||
653 | |a Urban Studies | ||
653 | |a Social Geography | ||
653 | |a Berlin | ||
653 | |a Geography | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/56958/1/9783839462324.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/84367 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |