Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse

Most twentieth-century attempts to develop a linguistic approach to literature rest on the assumption that litera-ture exists by opposition to all other uses of language-an assumption traditionally expressed as an opposition between "poetic" and "ordinary" language. Departing rad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pratt, Mary Louise (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Press 1977
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_88298
005 20220715
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220715s1977 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780253050892 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a CF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Pratt, Mary Louise  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse 
260 |b Indiana University Press  |c 1977 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Most twentieth-century attempts to develop a linguistic approach to literature rest on the assumption that litera-ture exists by opposition to all other uses of language-an assumption traditionally expressed as an opposition between "poetic" and "ordinary" language. Departing radically from this view, and drawing upon the findings of both sociolinguists and speech act theoreticians, Pratt argues against the notion that literature is formally and functionally distinct from our other verbal activities and points the way toward a unified theory of discourse. She shows how the poetic language argument, expounded by the Russian Formalists and developed by structuralists, fails, first on its own grounds, and second in the face of data from non-literary discourse, especially that presented by Labov in his studies of non-literary narrative; and suggests how recent developments in speech act theory and sociolinguistics correct previous theoretical deficiencies. The hypothesis emerges that a descriptive apparatus which can adequately account for non-literary uses of language will give a satisfactory account of literary discourse as well. An immensely important contribution to literary theory and linguistics. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a linguistics  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Linguistics 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/84684  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88298  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication