Current Approaches to Phonological Theory
Since the advent of generative phonology, linguists have turned their attention to elaborating or constraining the 'standard theory'. The present volume, the outgrowth of a conference held at Indiana University in the fall of 1977, engages in dialogue the leading proponents of some of the...
Saved in:
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Indiana University Press
1979
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_88308 | ||
005 | 20220715 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20220715s1979 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780253051127 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a CFH |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Dinnsen, Daniel A. |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Dinnsen, Daniel A. |4 oth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Current Approaches to Phonological Theory |
260 | |b Indiana University Press |c 1979 | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a Since the advent of generative phonology, linguists have turned their attention to elaborating or constraining the 'standard theory'. The present volume, the outgrowth of a conference held at Indiana University in the fall of 1977, engages in dialogue the leading proponents of some of the most stimulating current approaches to phonological theory and makes possible a serious and systematic comparison of their views. Some of the larger questions taken up in this volume are: What specific issues or problems have given rise to each new theoretical approach to force a depature from 'standard theory'? How do the new approaches differ from one another? What aspects of these differences are formal/empirical? Are there any bases for judging one theory or approach to be superior to another? | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Phonetics, phonology |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Phonetics, phonology | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/84801 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88308 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |