American Folklore Scholarship A Dialogue of Dissent

Rosemary Zumwalt examines the split between the literary folklorists and the anthropological folklorists during the period from 1888, when the American Folklore Society was founded, to the early 1940s, when control of the Journal of American Folklore by the anthropologists was ended. At the center o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zumwalt, Rosemary Levy (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Press 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_88371
005 20220715
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220715s1988 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780253055545 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFHF  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Zumwalt, Rosemary Levy  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a American Folklore Scholarship  |b A Dialogue of Dissent 
260 |b Indiana University Press  |c 1988 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Rosemary Zumwalt examines the split between the literary folklorists and the anthropological folklorists during the period from 1888, when the American Folklore Society was founded, to the early 1940s, when control of the Journal of American Folklore by the anthropologists was ended. At the center of the conflict were concerns of professionalism, science, and academic discipline. For the literary folklorists, the orientation was toward literary works and the unwritten tradition from which they derived. Folklorists a·lso focused on the study of literary types or genres. Child and Kittredge studied the ballad; Thompson, the folktale; Taylor, the riddle and the proverb. In anthropology, study was directed toward cultures without writing, and the emphasis was on fieldwork. Boas in his own writings, and in training his students, stressed collection of every aspect of the life of a people. And part of that material collected was folklore. The literary folklorists looked at literary forms for folklore while the anthropological folklorists looked at the life of the people and saw folklore only as part of it. Although this discipline-bound focus of the two factions created friction and led the two groups in different directions, it helped shape the development of the discipline in the United States. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Folklore, myths & legends  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Folklore, myths & legends 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/84815  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88371  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication